IS IT BETTER TO PURCHASE OR LEASE?

We'd like to help you decide by illustrating two charming stories of
foolish men and cunning women.

Purchasing
The maths on the Paul McCartney - Heather Mills divorce was as follows:
After 5 years of marriage, he paid her $49 million.
Assuming he had sex with her every night during their 5 year relationship
It ended up with him purchasing her @ $26,849 per time.

This is Heather...

                         

Leasing
On the other hand,  New York Governor Eliot Spitzer's favorite hooker, Kristen,  Charged $4,000 per night.


This is Kristen...

So, had Paul McCartney "employed" Kristen for 5 years @ $4,000 per night,
He would have paid only $7.3 million in total for sex every night.
This represents a $41..7 million saving for Eliot.
What a shrewd man Eliot is, compared to the ageing Beatle.
Further valuable benefits of this Leasing option are;
* a (real) 22 year old
* no need for coaxing / pleading / begging
* never a headache
* happily agrees to all technical requests
* no complaining
* no “Honey - please do this” lists

Best of all, she leaves and returns when asked.
All at 1/7th the cost and no legal fees.

What does Heather think about this Purchase v Lease conundrum?... 

Where would you rather be?... 

Leasing just makes more sense.

THE OLD ADAGE STILL HOLDS TRUE.....

IF IT DRIVES, FLIES, FUCKS, OR FLOATS............RENT IT!